The Future of Nursing 2020-2030

 

A Consensus Study from the National Academy of Medicine

 

Description

An ad hoc committee under the auspices of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will extend the vision for the nursing profession into 2030 and chart a path for the nursing profession to help our nation create a culture of health, reduce health disparities, and improve the health and well-being of the U.S. population in the 21st century. The committee will examine the lessons learned from the Future of Nursing Campaign for Action as well as the current state of science and technology to inform their assessment of the capacity of the profession to meet the anticipated health and social care demands from 2020 to 2030.

In examining current and future challenges, the committee will consider:

  • The role of nurses in improving the health of individuals, families, and communities by addressing social determinants of health and providing effective, efficient, equitable, and accessible care for all across the care continuum, as well as identifying the system facilitators and barriers to achieving this goal.
  • The current and future deployment of all levels of nurses across the care continuum, including in collaborative practice models, to address the challenges of building a culture of health.
  • System facilitators and barriers to achieving a workforce that is diverse, including gender, race, and ethnicity, across all levels of nursing education.
  • The role of the nursing profession in assuring that the voice of individuals, families and communities are incorporated into design and operations of clinical and community health systems.
  • The training and competency-development needed to prepare nurses, including advance practice nurses, to work outside of acute care settings and to lead efforts to build a culture of health and health equity, and the extent to which current curriculum meets these needs.
  • The ability of nurses to serve as change agents in creating systems that bridge the delivery of health care and social needs care in the community.
  • The research needed to identify or develop effective nursing practices for eliminating gaps and disparities in health care.
  • The importance of nurse well-being and resilience in ensuring the delivery of high quality care and improving community health.

In developing its recommendations for the future decade of nursing in the United States, the committee will draw from domestic and global examples of evidence-based models of care that address social determinants of health and help build and sustain a culture of health.

Dr. Edna Cadmus provided testimony on behalf of the NJAC and NJCCN to the committee.

Nurses, Be Counted!

Nurses on the NJCCN Board discuss New Jersey’s residency programs.

Greetings,

Nurses, Be Counted!

You may know that the Nurses on Boards Coalition is in the midst of its annual campaign to register nurses’ board service. If you serve on a board, and haven’t already registered, please visit the Nurses on Boards Coalition website, and be counted.

The mission of the Nurses on Boards Coalition is to improve the health of communities and the nation through the service of at least 10,000 nurses on boards by 2020.

Please also share with other nurses in your network, and on social media. Suggested tweets are below:

I’ve reported my board service with @NursesonBoards. Have you? www.nursesonboardscoalition.org/ #10kNurses #RNsBeCounted

Help @NursesonBoards reach its goal of getting #10kNurses on boards by 2020. www.nursesonboardscoalition.org/ #RNsBeCounted

Learn more about @NursesonBoards goal of getting #10kNurses on boards by 2020 by visiting: www.nursesonboardscoalition.org/ #RNsBeCounted

 

Sincerely,

Edna Cadmus PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN

Executive Director, NJCCN

Co-Lead NJAC

Nursing Faculty Shortage

NJCCN published a one-page summary of nurse faculty vacancy rates from 2015-2017. This summary uses data from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) and NJCCN’s own Educational Capacity Report. Click here to view a printer-friendly version of the report. In September of 2018, NJCCN formed a committee to address address the growing nursing faculty shortage and review solutions.

National Data (aacnnursing.org)

  • S. nursing schools turned away 64,067 qualified applicants from baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs in 2016 due to insufficient number of faculty, clinical sites, classroom space, clinical preceptors and budget constraints.
  • AACN 2016 survey of 832 nursing schools with baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs:
    • 1,567 vacancies were identified
    • An additional 133 faculty positions are needed to meet student demand
    • National nurse faculty vacancy rate = 7.9%
    • 8% of vacancies were for faculty positions requiring or preferring a doctoral degree.
  • AACN 2015-2016 report average age of doctorally-prepared nurse faculty:
    • Professor – average age 62.2 years
    • Associate Professor – average age 57.6 years
    • Assistant Professor – average age 51.1 years
  • Average salary for a master’s prepared Assistant Professor in schools of nursing = $77,022. (AACN, 2016)

New Jersey Data (njccn.org)

  • Educational Survey 2017 – Full-time position vacancies = 51 (8.1%)

Institute for Healthcare Improvement White Paper

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement published a white paper titled “IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work.” Please see the executive summary, below, and click the image to read the full publication.

With increasing demands on time, resources, and energy, in addition to poorly designed systems of daily work, it’s not surprising health care professionals are experiencing burnout at increasingly higher rates, with staff turnover rates also on the rise. Yet, joy in work is more than just the absence of burnout or an issue of individual wellness; it is a system property. It is generated (or not) by the system and occurs (or not) organization-wide. Joy in work – or lack thereof – not only impacts individual staff engagement and satisfaction, but also patient experience, quality of care, patient safety, and organizational performance.

This white paper is intended to serve as a guide for health care organizations to engage in a participative process where leaders ask colleagues at all levels of the organization, “What matters to you?” – enabling them to better understand the barriers to joy in work, and co-create meaningful, high-leverage strategies to address these issues.

This white paper describes the following:

  • The importance of joy in work (the “why”);
  • Four steps leaders can take to improve joy in work (“the how”);
  • The IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work: nine critical components of a system for ensuring a joyful, engaged workforce (the “what”);
  • Key change ideas for improving joy in work, along with examples from organizations that helped test them; and
  • Measurement and assessment tools for gauging efforts to improve joy in work.

Perlo J, Balik B, Swensen S, Kabcenell A, Landsman J, Feeley D. IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work. IHI White Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2017. (Available at ihi.org)

2017 Nursing Community Coalition

“For over a decade, the Nursing Community Coalition has been a partnership of national professional nursing associations that builds consensus and advocates on a wide spectrum of healthcare issues. Collectively, the Nursing Community is comprised of 58 national nursing organizations that represent the cross section of education, practice, research, and regulation within the profession. With over four million licensed registered nurses, advanced practice registered nurses, and nursing students, the profession embodied the drive and passion to continually improve care for patients, families, and communities across the nation.”

For more information, follow the links below to a fact sheet and the 2017 Nursing Community Roster.

IOM Recommendations Update

 Progress in Achieving the Recommendations of the 2010 Institute of Medicine Report on

The Future of Nursing: Leading Change and Advancing Health

 Scope of Practice: An Updated Review of the Evidence
Prepared by
Joanne Spetz, PhD
Professor
Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies
University of California, San Francisco

 

 Acknowledgements:  Mary Naylor provided expert guidance via the Interdisciplinary Nursing Research Quality Initiative, INQRI. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided generous support for this literature review. 

Nurses should practice to the full extent of their education and training.” (Theme 1)

Evidence Brief:  Nurse Scope of Practice

Summary:  The IOM Future of Nursing Report recommended, on the basis of research evidence through 2009, that the U.S. should remove scope-of-practice barriers. Additional evidence has been published in 2016 and 2017 supporting the association between nurses having full practice authority and the supply of providers, access to care, quality of care, and costs. This research has focused primarily on nurse practitioners (NPs). Findings reinforce and strengthen prior research indicating that NPs provide primary care of similar quality as physicians, and that full practice authority for NPs is associated with greater access to care, fewer avoidable hospitalizations, fewer hospital readmissions, fewer emergency department visits specific conditions, and cost savings.

Methods

A new search on PubMed and a file of previously-collected articles were reviewed for articles published in 2016 or 2017 that examined the impact of advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) care on quality and costs. The literature was also reviewed to identify articles that examined the effect of scope of practice regulations on supply of nurse practitioners, their roles and satisfaction within health care organizations, access to care, quality of care, and costs. A total of 177 articles were retrieved, 43 of which were relevant to the aims of this review.

What is the strength of the new evidence published in 2016 and 2017 that full practice authority in nursing is associated with access to care, quality of care, and costs?

Over the past year, some new original research and several systematic reviews have been published on access, supply and quality of care provided by advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), with particular attention to the effects of NP, and the effects of these clinicians on costs of care. The evidence is stronger regarding the relationship between NP scope of practice and access to care than for costs, although the evidence regarding costs has strengthened over the past year.

What are the key findings of new research in 2016 and 2017 on the association between full practice authority and access to care, quality of care, and costs?

  • Access to care:
    • A literature review concluded that states granting NPs greater SOP authority exhibited an increase in the number and growth of NPs, greater care provision by NPs, and expanded health care utilization, especially among rural and vulnerable populations (Xue, Ye, Brewer, & Spetz, 2016).
    • An analysis of data from ambulatory medical practices found that NPs were more likely to work in primary care in states with full scope of practice, and also were more likely to provide primary care if the state also reimbursed NPs at 100% of the physician Medicaid fee-for-service rate (Barnes et al., 2016). A study of county-level data also concluded that removing scope of practice restrictions could modestly expand the capacity of the primary care workforce in the short-run (Graves et al., 2016).
    • A national study focused on nursing homes from 2000-2010 found an increase in the employment of NPs in nursing homes, but that scope of practice regulations had a “mixed” impact on NP employment growth (Intrator et al., 2015).
    • An analysis of NP scope of practice changes in three states found that relaxation of regulations was associated with retail clinic growth (Brooks Carthon, Sammarco, Pancir, Chittams, & Nicely, 2016).
  • Primary care outcomes:
    • An evaluation of a program that provided NP comanagement for a home-based primary care program reported that there was a high level of provider satisfaction and reductions in annual hospitalization and readmission rates among high-risk home-bound patients (Jones et al., 2016).
    • An evaluation of NP visits for African-American teens with asthma found a positive relationship between the number of NP visits and the students’ appropriate use of urgent care versus emergency room visits (Luckose, Harrison, & Velsor-Friedrich, 2016). Similarly, an early-stage evaluation of an NP-delivered intervention to reduce obesity in a primary care setting reported improvement in health responsibility, physical activity, nutrition, spiritual growth, stress management, and motivation for healthy living, and a decline in diastolic blood pressure declined (Ritten, Waldrop, & Kitson, 2016).
    • Some studies reported negative or neutral effects of NP care. A study of national rates of prescribing of opioid and benzodiazepine medications reported that there was no difference in statewide prescribing rates between states with restricted practice versus full practice authority for NPs (Schirle & McCabe, 2016). A study in Pennsylvania focused on prescribing of new chronic disease medications, reporting that NPs/PAs were slower to adopt new pharmaceuticals. This finding may suggest that NPs/PAs are more focused on evidence-based practice, receive less intense marketing from drug companies, or are more attentive to costs; the authors concluded that more research is needed to understand the differences (Marcum, Bellon, Li, Gellad, & Donohue, 2016). One study that used national survey data found that, compared to people with physician only care, patients with NPs/PAs as usual providers and supplemental providers had more primary care visits. Patients reporting NPs/PAs as supplemental providers had a greater risk of emergency department utilization and lower satisfaction; this relationship was not observed when NPs/PAs were usual providers. No differences were seen for hospitalizations or unmet need (Everett, Morgan, & Jackson, 2016). Another study reported that NPs had higher rates of antibiotic prescribing compared to physicians for pediatric patients for upper respiratory tract infections, although it is not clear if this is an indicator of good or bad care (Ference et al., 2016).
  • Outcomes for specific conditions and settings:
    • Two studies reported that NP-led interventions for patients with diabetes in pre-operative and inpatient cardiology services were associated with better glycemic control and quality of life (Garg et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017).
    • Multiple studies found positive effects of NPs on quality of care for cardiology services, including for a chest pain evaluation unit and for cardioversion (Ingram, McKee, Quirke, Kelly, & Moloney, 2016; Norton et al., 2016; Zhu, Islam, & Bergmann, 2016). An NP-led program for home-based patients with congestive heart failure reported a reduction in 30-day readmissions (Moore, 2016).
    • Two studies found that NP coverage in neurocritical care reduced door-to-needle time for stroke patients (Moran, Nakagawa, Asai, & Koenig, 2016). A study of an NP-led transitional stroke program documented that it reduced readmissions (Condon, Lycan, Duncan, & Bushnell, 2016).
    • A study of patient who had been admitted to the hospital for chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) reported that, compared to patients cared for by physicians, patients cared for by NPs/PAs more often received appropriate short-term treatment and referral to a pulmonologist. They also were less like to visit an emergency department for COPD compared to patients cared for by physicians (Agarwal, Zhang, Kuo, & Sharma, 2016).
    • A study of NPs in critical care units found they achieve similar outcomes as resident teams (Landsperger, Semler, Wang, Byrne, & Wheeler, 2016).
    • The addition of NPs and PAs to a liver transplantation program led to improved outcomes, including graft survival (Chaney, Harnois, Musto, & Nguyen, 2016).
    • The addition of an NP to an orthopedic trauma center was associated with a significant decrease in length of stay and costs (Hiza, Gottschalk, Umpierrez, Bush, & Reisman, 2015).
    • Two studies of NPs in pediatric inpatient settings reported fewer unplanned intensive care unit transfers and lower length of stay (Rejtar, Ranstrom, & Allcox, 2017; Rowan et al., 2016).
    • Three studies of NPs in long-term care settings found evidence of their benefit in these settings. One study compared the costs and effectiveness of establishing NP-MD teams for nursing home care. They reported reductions in emergency department transfers, but the data were not sufficient to demonstrate cost-effectiveness (Lacny et al., 2016). Another study evaluated the establishment of an NP-led pain management team in a nursing home, and reported significant improvements in resident pain and functional status (Kaasalainen et al., 2016). A third paper examined the impact of closing an NP-led program of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE), reporting increases in emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and nursing home placements post-PACE (Meunier et al., 2016).
    • One study has been published in nurse-midwife scope of practice, reporting that restrictive scope of practice laws were neither helpful nor harmful in regards to maternal behaviors and infant health outcomes, but states that allowed nurse-midwives to practice with no barriers had lower rates of induced labor and Cesarean section births (Markowitz, Adams, Lewitt, & Dunlop, 2016).
    • A study of scope of practice regulations for nurse-anesthetists found no evidence that the odds of a complication differ by scope of practice (Negrusa, Hogan, Warner, Schroeder, & Pang, 2016).
  • Costs and economic impact:
    • An analysis of Medicare data reported that evaluation and management payments for beneficiaries assigned to an NP were 29% less than payment for beneficiaries assigned to primary care physicians. There also were lower payments for inpatient and office visit payments (Perloff, DesRoches, & Buerhaus, 2016).
    • An analysis of insurance claims data found that restrictive NP scope of practice restrictions increased the price of a well-child visit by 3-16%, with no difference in quality outcomes (Kleiner, Marier, Park, & Wing, 2016).
    • Analysis of Medicaid insurance claims revealed that allowing PAs to prescribe controlled substances had a significant association with a reduction in the cost of claims of 11% per Medicaid recipient. Allowing NPs full prescribing authority was also associated with lower costs but the relationship was not statistically significant (Timmons, 2016).
    • Removal of scope of practice restrictions between 1999 and 2012 decreased the number of malpractice payments made by physicians by as much as 31% (McMichael, Buerhaus, & Safriet, 2017).
    • A study of the addition of NPs and physician assistants (PAs) to primary care teams were associated with significantly fewer specialist referrals. It also was associated with fewer hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and advanced diagnostic imaging services, but these effects were not statistically significant (Liu et al., 2017). An unrelated study used national data from ambulatory medical practices and found that NPs/PAs and physicians provided an equivalent amount of low-value health services for three common conditions, thus negating the hypothesis that NPs/PAs lower-value care (Mafi, Wee, Davis, & Landon, 2016).
    • A simulation model was used to estimate the economic impact of adding an NP or PA to a rural community. The analysis found that a rural NP/PA can generate 4.4 local jobs if the community does not have a hospital, and 18.5 jobs if it does (Eilrich, 2016).
  • Clinical roles, autonomy, and satisfaction:
    • Nurse practitioners who worked in primary care reported the highest levels of autonomy compared with other settings (Athey et al., 2016). NPs in rural settings – particularly remote areas – also reported greater autonomy and job satisfaction (Spetz, Skillman, & Andrilla, 2016).
    • Surveys of NPs and physicians revealed that physicians generally believed that NPs needed some association with physicians for patient safety, and NPs preferred having a physician readily accessible as needed (Kraus & DuBois, 2016).
    • An exploratory survey found that NPs perceived that requirements for physician oversight impacted their practice and may jeopardize patient safety (Lowery, Scott, & Swanson, 2016). An unrelated survey reported that NP autonomy and favorable relationships with leadership improve teamwork (Poghosyan & Liu, 2016).

References

Agarwal, A., Zhang, W., Kuo, Y., & Sharma, G. (2016). Process and Outcome Measures among COPD Patients with a Hospitalization Cared for by an Advance Practice Provider or Primary Care Physician. [Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. PLoS One, 11(2), e0148522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148522

Athey, E. K., Leslie, M. S., Briggs, L. A., Park, J., Falk, N. L., Pericak, A., . . . Greene, J. (2016). How important are autonomy and work setting to nurse practitioners’ job satisfaction? J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 28(6), 320-326. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12292

Barnes, H., Maier, C. B., Altares Sarik, D., Germack, H. D., Aiken, L. H., & McHugh, M. D. (2016). Effects of Regulation and Payment Policies on Nurse Practitioners’ Clinical Practices. Med Care Res Rev. doi: 10.1177/1077558716649109

Brooks Carthon, J. M., Sammarco, T., Pancir, D., Chittams, J., & Nicely, K. W. (2016). Growth in Retail-Based Clinics Following Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice Reform. Nursing Outlook, Online November 2016.

Chaney, A. J., Harnois, D. M., Musto, K. R., & Nguyen, J. H. (2016). Role Development of Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in Liver Transplantation. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Prog Transplant, 26(1), 75-81. doi: 10.1177/1526924816632116

Condon, C., Lycan, S., Duncan, P., & Bushnell, C. (2016). Reducing Readmissions After Stroke With a Structured Nurse Practitioner/Registered Nurse Transitional Stroke Program. Stroke, 47(6), 1599-1604. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012524

Eilrich, F. C. (2016). The economic effect of a physician assistant or nurse practitioner in rural America. Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 29(10), 44-48. doi: 10.1097/01.Jaa.0000496956.02958.Dd

Everett, C. M., Morgan, P., & Jackson, G. L. (2016). Primary care physician assistant and advance practice nurses roles: Patient healthcare utilization, unmet need, and satisfaction. Healthc (Amst), 4(4), 327-333. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.03.005

Ference, E. H., Min, J. Y., Chandra, R. K., Schroeder, J. W., Jr., Ciolino, J. D., Yang, A., . . . Shintani Smith, S. (2016). Antibiotic Prescribing by Physicians Versus Nurse Practitioners for Pediatric Upper Respiratory Infections. [Comparative Study]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 125(12), 982-991. doi: 10.1177/0003489416668193

Garg, R., Metzger, C., Rein, R., Lortie, M., Underwood, P., Hurwitz, S., . . . Schuman, B. (2016). Nurse practitioner-mediated intervention for preoperative control of diabetes in elective surgery patients. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 28(10), 528-533. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12365

Graves, J. A., Mishra, P., Dittus, R. S., Parikh, R., Perloff, J., & Buerhaus, P. I. (2016). Role of Geography and Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice in Efforts to Expand Primary Care System Capacity: Health Reform and the Primary Care Workforce. [Observational Study

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Med Care, 54(1), 81-89. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000454

Hiza, E. A., Gottschalk, M. B., Umpierrez, E., Bush, P., & Reisman, W. M. (2015). Effect of a Dedicated Orthopaedic Advanced Practice Provider in a Level I Trauma Center: Analysis of Length of Stay and Cost. [Comparative Study

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. J Orthop Trauma, 29(7), e225-230. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000261

Ingram, S. J., McKee, G., Quirke, M. B., Kelly, N., & Moloney, A. (2016). Discharge of Non-Acute Coronary Syndrome Chest Pain Patients From Emergency Care to an Advanced Nurse Practitioner-Led Chest Pain Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Study of Referral Source and Final Diagnosis. J Cardiovasc Nurs. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000374

Intrator, O., Miller, E. A., Gadbois, E., Acquah, J. K., Makineni, R., & Tyler, D. (2015). Trends in Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant Practice in Nursing Homes, 2000-2010. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. Health Serv Res, 50(6), 1772-1786. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12410

Jones, M. G., DeCherrie, L. V., Meah, Y. S., Hernandez, C. R., Lee, E. J., Skovran, D. M., . . . Ornstein, K. A. (2016). Using Nurse Practitioner Comanagement to Reduce Hospitalizations and Readmissions Within a Home-Based Primary Care Program. J Healthc Qual. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000059

Kaasalainen, S., Wickson-Griffiths, A., Akhtar-Danesh, N., Brazil, K., Donald, F., Martin-Misener, R., . . . Dolovich, L. (2016). The effectiveness of a nurse practitioner-led pain management team in long-term care: A mixed methods study. Int J Nurs Stud, 62, 156-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.07.022

Kleiner, M. M., Marier, A., Park, K. W., & Wing, C. (2016). Relaxing Occupational Licensing Requirements: Analyzing Wages and Prices for a Medical Service. Journal of Law & Economics, 59(2), 261-291. doi: 10.1086/688093

Kraus, E., & DuBois, J. M. (2016). Knowing Your Limits: A Qualitative Study of Physician and Nurse Practitioner Perspectives on NP Independence in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3896-7

Lacny, S., Zarrabi, M., Martin-Misener, R., Donald, F., Sketris, I., Murphy, A. L., . . . Marshall, D. A. (2016). Cost-effectiveness of a nurse practitioner-family physician model of care in a nursing home: controlled before and after study. J Adv Nurs, 72(9), 2138-2152. doi: 10.1111/jan.12989

Landsperger, J. S., Semler, M. W., Wang, L., Byrne, D. W., & Wheeler, A. P. (2016). Outcomes of Nurse Practitioner-Delivered Critical Care: A Prospective Cohort Study. Chest, 149(5), 1146-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.015

Li, S., Roschkov, S., Alkhodair, A., O’Neill, B. J., Chik, C. L., Tsuyuki, R. T., & Gyenes, G. T. (2017). The Effect of Nurse Practitioner-Led Intervention in Diabetes Care for Patients Admitted to Cardiology Services. Can J Diabetes, 41(1), 10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.06.008

Liu, H., Robbins, M., Mehrotra, A., Auerbach, D., Robinson, B. E., Cromwell, L. F., & Roblin, D. W. (2017). The Impact of Using Mid-level Providers in Face-to-Face Primary Care on Health Care Utilization. Med Care, 55(1), 12-18. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000590

Lowery, B., Scott, E., & Swanson, M. (2016). Nurse practitioner perceptions of the impact of physician oversight on quality and safety of nurse practitioner practice. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 28(8), 436-445. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12336

Luckose, A. B., Harrison, P. R., & Velsor-Friedrich, B. (2016). Effect of Nurse Practitioner Visits on Health Outcomes in African American Teens With Asthma. West J Nurs Res, 38(10), 1389. doi: 10.1177/0193945916658198

Mafi, J. N., Wee, C. C., Davis, R. B., & Landon, B. E. (2016). Comparing Use of Low-Value Health Care Services Among U.S. Advanced Practice Clinicians and Physicians. Ann Intern Med, 165(4), 237-244. doi: 10.7326/M15-2152

Marcum, Z. A., Bellon, J. E., Li, J., Gellad, W. F., & Donohue, J. M. (2016). New chronic disease medication prescribing by nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and primary care physicians: a cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res, 16, 312. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1569-1

Markowitz, S., Adams, E. K., Lewitt, M. J., & Dunlop, A. (2016). Competitive effects of scope of practice restrictions: Public health or public harm? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 22780. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

McMichael, B. J., Buerhaus, P., & Safriet, B. J. (2017). The Extraregulatory Effect of Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice Laws on Physician Malpractice Rates. Medical Care Research and Review, Online January 2017.

Meunier, M. J., Brant, J. M., Audet, S., Dickerson, D., Gransbery, K., & Ciemins, E. L. (2016). Life after PACE (Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly): A retrospective/prospective, qualitative analysis of the impact of closing a nurse practitioner centered PACE site. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 28(11), 596-603. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12379

Moore, J. A. (2016). Evaluation of the efficacy of a nurse practitioner-led home-based congestive heart failure clinical pathway. Home Health Care Serv Q, 35(1), 39-51. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2016.1175992

Moran, J. L., Nakagawa, K., Asai, S. M., & Koenig, M. A. (2016). 24/7 Neurocritical Care Nurse Practitioner Coverage Reduced Door-to-Needle Time in Stroke Patients Treated with Tissue Plasminogen Activator. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t

Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 25(5), 1148-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.033

Negrusa, B., Hogan, P. F., Warner, J. T., Schroeder, C. H., & Pang, B. (2016). Scope of Practice Laws and Anesthesia Complications: No Measurable Impact of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Expanded Scope of Practice on Anesthesia-related Complications. Med Care, 54(10), 913-920. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000554

Norton, L., Tsiperfal, A., Cook, K., Bagdasarian, A., Varady, J., Shah, M., & Wang, P. (2016). Effectiveness and Safety of an Independently Run Nurse Practitioner Outpatient Cardioversion Program (2009 to 2014). Am J Cardiol, 118(12), 1842-1846. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.074

Perloff, J., DesRoches, C. M., & Buerhaus, P. (2016). Comparing the Cost of Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries Assigned to Primary Care Nurse Practitioners and Physicians. Health Serv Res, 51(4), 1407-1423. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12425

Poghosyan, L., & Liu, J. (2016). Nurse Practitioner Autonomy and Relationships with Leadership Affect Teamwork in Primary Care Practices: a Cross-Sectional Survey. J Gen Intern Med, 31(7), 771-777. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3652-z

Rejtar, M., Ranstrom, L., & Allcox, C. (2017). Development of the 24/7 Nurse Practitioner Model on the Inpatient Pediatric General Surgery Service at a Large Tertiary Care Children’s Hospital and Associated Outcomes. J Pediatr Health Care, 31(1), 131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2016.08.007

Ritten, A., Waldrop, J., & Kitson, J. (2016). Fit living in progress–fighting lifelong obesity patterns (FLIP-FLOP): A nurse practitioner delivered intervention. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Appl Nurs Res, 30, 119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.09.006

Rowan, C. M., Cristea, A. I., Hamilton, J. C., Taylor, N. M., Nitu, M. E., & Ackerman, V. L. (2016). Nurse practitioner coverage is associated with a decrease in length of stay in a pediatric chronic ventilator dependent unit. World J Clin Pediatr, 5(2), 191-197. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.191

Schirle, L., & McCabe, B. E. (2016). State variation in opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions between independent and nonindependent advanced practice registered nurse prescribing states. [Comparative Study

Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. Nurs Outlook, 64(1), 86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2015.10.003

Spetz, J., Skillman, S. M., & Andrilla, C. H. (2016). Nurse Practitioner Autonomy and Satisfaction in Rural Settings. Med Care Res Rev. doi: 10.1177/1077558716629584

Timmons, E. J. (2016). The effects of expanded nurse practitioner and physician assistant scope of practice on the cost of Medicaid patient care. Health Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.12.002

Xue, Y., Ye, Z., Brewer, C., & Spetz, J. (2016). Impact of state nurse practitioner scope-of-practice regulation on health care delivery: Systematic review.  Nurs Outlook, 64(1), 71-85. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2015.08.005

Zhu, Z., Islam, S., & Bergmann, S. R. (2016). Effectiveness and outcomes of a nurse practitioner-run chest pain evaluation unit. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 28(11), 591-595. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12377